0

Your Cart is Empty

Porsche Taycan Real World Range

by Eva Fox December 14, 2019

Porsche Taycan Real World Range

The Driven - The Porsche Taycan Turbo is a power-hungry electricity guzzler that uses double that of the Tesla Model 3, new figures from the US-based EPA has found.

On Thursday electric vehicle and Porsche fans were stunned when official driving range and power consumption figures were released for the Taycan Turbo, the mid-range variant of Porsche’s first foray into electric mobility.

With just 201 miles of “real world range” (the EPA rating is known as the more accurate of three ratings standards globally), the Taycan Turbo was originally billed by the German luxury carmaker to offer 280 miles of range.

In the lead up to the Taycan launch in September, Porsche spent a considerable amount of marketing energy, extolling the sustainable and repeatable power and endurance made possible by the Taycan’s 800 volt electrical architecture.

But now, the EPA figures show that this also means with an average power consumption of 49kWh per 100 miles, the Taycan Turbo gobbles through nearly twice the power of the Tesla Model 3 Long Range which uses an average 26kWh per 100 miles.

Source: fueleconomy.gov

When questioned about the disappointing range figure by The Verge, a spokesperson for Porsche said it was “lower than what we were anticipating, but it is what it is.”

Most interestingly, it turns out that Porsche may have anticipated the low range figures from the EPA and went out an ordered its own independent testing from a firm called AMCI, as pointed out by Jalopnik.

These tests state a range much closer to Porsche’s original estimate, achieving 275 miles (442km) in normal mode and 288 miles (463km) in the power-saving range mode.

Source: AMCI

AMCI notes on its website the methodology used:

  • The Taycan Turbo was driven over two specific routes: AMCI Testing’s Certified City/Highway Route (commute simulation in Normal Mode) and AMCI Testing’s Real-World City Route (city-driving simulation in Range Mode)
  • All driving was done during weekdays at the same time of day
  • The vehicle began each test cycle with its state-of-charge (SOC) indicator at 100%
  • It was operated on course until it entered its restricted-power “limp home” mode—which was considered the vehicle’s terminal mileage for battery depletion
  • All accessory loads were held consistent during each testing cycle and headlights were set to “Auto”

But back to the Tesla comparison. Holding the Taycan Turbo up to the Model 3 Long Range is just not fair – after all, the Model 3 is aimed at the mass-market and the $48,490 Long Range configuration is designed for distance.

Better to hold it up against the Tesla Model S Performance, which sells from $99,990 compared to the Taycan Turbo’s starting price of $150,900.

But, even here however it proves heavier on consumption, and still woefully short on driving range compared to the Model S Performance’s 32kWh/100 mile (19kWh/100km) average consumption and 322 miles (600km) range.

Source: fueleconomy.gov

Studies show us that if you want to buy a car that meets the stated specifications, then the Porsche Taycan Turbo is definitely not a good choice. Once again, German manufacturers are trying to trick consumers who buy or want to buy their product.




Also in Tesmanian Blog

Time features SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell as one of the '100 Most Influential People of 2020'
Time features SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell as one of the '100 Most Influential People of 2020'

by Evelyn Arevalo September 23, 2020 0 Comments

Gwynne Shotwell is an Engineer, President and Chief Operating Officer of SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk. 
Read More
California Governor: All New Passenger Cars Sold By 2035 Must Be Zero-Emission
California Governor: All New Passenger Cars Sold By 2035 Must Be Zero-Emission

by Eva Fox September 23, 2020 0 Comments

On September 23, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order to ban the sale of new gasoline-only vehicles starting in 2035. According to the order, all new passenger cars sold in California after the specified deadline must be zero-emission--a category that includes electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, and plug-in hybrids that still use gasoline or diesel in addition to electricity. 
Read More
Tesla Next-Gen 4680 Battery Costs 56% Less to Make, Could Mean a Mind-Blowing $70 Per KWh or Less
Tesla Next-Gen 4680 Battery Costs 56% Less to Make, Could Mean a Mind-Blowing $70 Per KWh or Less

by Eva Fox September 23, 2020 0 Comments

Considering the improvements presented at Battery Day, the cost of producing Tesla batteries will be about $68/kWh. However, battery technology is constantly evolving, which may mean that at the moment, the cost of producing Tesla batteries may already be lower than presented by Cairn Energy. Considering this, we can safely assume that in 2-3 years, the cost could be significantly lower than 70$/kWh. 
Read More

Previous  / Next