0

Your Cart is Empty

Tesla Giga 4 Berlin Promised Rapid Construction By Prime Minster

by Eva Fox March 09, 2020

Tesla Giga 4 Berlin Promised Rapid Construction By Prime Minster

On November 12, 2019, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that Tesla would build its Gigafactory 4 near Berlin, in the state of Brandenburg. Locating his plant in the heart of Europe was a strategically important and smart move. But, the ambitious schedule of Tesla caused doubts among people who know about the bureaucratic apparatus of Germany.

Nearly 2 years ago, Musk tweeted that Germany is the company's favorite when choosing a location for the future factory.

From that moment, representatives of various federal states tried to interest Tesla. Brandenburg was no exception. Among all, this state had a number of advantages, including the location of the proposed site, which made it the main applicant:

  • this place is only 30 minutes away from the capital of Germany, Berlin. There are a lot of talents in the capital, so such close proximity makes it possible that they will be interested in working at the Tesla factory;
  • it was in this place that BMW had previously planned to build its plant and did a great environmental job, and many permits have already been received. This factor made this place one of the fastest places to start construction;
  • near the site there is a wind farm and the plant intends to buy clean energy from it.

In addition to these factors, there were others. Welt am Sonntag released its report, which revealed some new details of the deal.

The report cited quotes from letters from state politicians to Musk. In addition to the above, Brandenbugr promised to provide funding from the state and from the European Union. It was also pointed out that there are low taxes on trade.

A January 2019 letter from Jörg Steinbach stated that, in particular, Lusatia “was taken into account not only through funding from the state of Brandenburg, but also by significant funds from the federal government and Europe across borders,” he continued “In addition, you will not find one other federal state in Germany with such low local trade taxes as Brandenburg.”

Dietmar Woidke writes in a letter from August 2019: “On a European scale, Brandenburg is one of the areas with the most interesting financing conditions.” The location also offers "favorable tax conditions."


Source: Emil Senkel

Woidke also adds that this place has “a favorable coverage area for both Brandenburg and the labor markets in Berlin and Western Poland.” The state can support the training of new Tesla employees in Brandenburg up to 10,000 euros per person.

Of course, proximity to workers in the west of neighboring Poland played an important role in locating the Tesla gigafactory in Brandenburg. This is evidenced by the fact that already in January, the automaker posted on its website a list of some vacancies, which, among other requirements, included knowledge of the Polish language. At that time, these positions mainly included recruiting staff. Poland is only 37 miles from Grünheide.


Source: Gruenderszene

Tesla plans to provide 12,000 jobs. According to Teslamag, the unemployment rate in the Tesla area in the Oder Spree has recently been only 6.4 percent. This means that the local population will not be able to cover the need of the factory for workers. Of course, many local talented people are interested in working in Tesla, but Polish workers will certainly not be superfluous in the factory.

In addition, the letters, obviously, should also make it clear that the approval procedures will not be unnecessarily delaying the Tesla project. Woidke also wrote: “We will support you with all appropriate options to ensure that your temporary goals are achieved,” he continuous, “For all questions regarding the approval law required in connection with your planned investments (for example, environmental impact assessment, emission control approval procedure, forest conversion), I assure you of prompt and quick processing”

Construction of the plant is scheduled to begin in the first half of 2020, and completion is scheduled for July 2021. It is planned that annually from the assembly line of this factory should be produced 500,000 electric vehicles. Model Y and Model 3 will be produced here, which are so important for Tesla and with which the electric vehicle manufacturer wants to break into the mass market.

More info also available in Teslamag.de

Featured image: IMAGO / MARTIN MÜLLER

 




Also in Tesmanian Blog

Time features SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell as one of the '100 Most Influential People of 2020'
Time features SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell as one of the '100 Most Influential People of 2020'

by Evelyn Arevalo September 23, 2020 0 Comments

Gwynne Shotwell is an Engineer, President and Chief Operating Officer of SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk. 
Read More
California Governor: All New Passenger Cars Sold By 2035 Must Be Zero-Emission
California Governor: All New Passenger Cars Sold By 2035 Must Be Zero-Emission

by Eva Fox September 23, 2020 0 Comments

On September 23, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order to ban the sale of new gasoline-only vehicles starting in 2035. According to the order, all new passenger cars sold in California after the specified deadline must be zero-emission--a category that includes electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, and plug-in hybrids that still use gasoline or diesel in addition to electricity. 
Read More
Tesla Next-Gen 4680 Battery Costs 56% Less to Make, Could Mean a Mind-Blowing $70 Per KWh or Less
Tesla Next-Gen 4680 Battery Costs 56% Less to Make, Could Mean a Mind-Blowing $70 Per KWh or Less

by Eva Fox September 23, 2020 0 Comments

Considering the improvements presented at Battery Day, the cost of producing Tesla batteries will be about $68/kWh. However, battery technology is constantly evolving, which may mean that at the moment, the cost of producing Tesla batteries may already be lower than presented by Cairn Energy. Considering this, we can safely assume that in 2-3 years, the cost could be significantly lower than 70$/kWh. 
Read More

Previous  / Next